InVideo
Turn text into video with AI in minutes
Key Facts
- •Free plan includes watermarks; weekly limits apply (typically 10 mins/week, 4 exports/week; limits may vary by account).
- •Credits/minutes are consumed on edits and regenerations, not just initial generation (user reports confirm this behavior).
- •Commercial/resale rights depend on plan tier; review Terms for your specific use case.
- •Some users report export failures at 99% completion for longer videos; Chrome is recommended over Firefox for reliability.
Bottom Line
InVideo AI is best for creators who want a fast prompt-to-video workflow for Shorts and simple social ads. The trade-off is cost control: heavy iteration can burn minutes/credits quickly, and commercial/resale rights depend on your plan. If you need frame-level editing, you'll likely be happier with a traditional editor.
Best For
User feedback snapshot
What users like
- ✓Users appreciate the all-in-one workflow that handles script generation and asset sourcing
- ✓Access to premium stock libraries is seen as a time-saver compared to managing separate subscriptions
- ✓The learning curve is gentle for those new to video creation
Common complaints
- ✕Credits can run out quickly with heavy iteration and regeneration
- ✕Watermark on free plan limits professional publishing
- ✕Export quality depends on plan tier, which can be confusing
Based on user reports; details vary by plan/account.
Common issues to know before you pay
Edits/regenerations may burn minutes/credits faster than expected
Action: Check official docs or ask support before upgrading.
Export can stall on longer videos / browser reliability issues
Action: Check official docs or ask support before upgrading.
Refund/cancellation frustration (especially annual)
Action: Check official docs or ask support before upgrading.
Stock relevance can be generic/off-topic and require manual swaps
Action: Check official docs or ask support before upgrading.
Frequently asked questions
Yes—you can try it on the free plan, but exports are watermarked and usage is capped. Treat it as a workflow trial, not a plan for publishing consistently.
Often, yes—users report that regenerating scenes or making certain changes can deduct minutes/credits, not just the first generation. If you iterate heavily, track usage closely and finalize your script before regenerating.
Usually, monetization is safest on paid tiers where commercial terms are clearer. For client work or resale, double-check your plan's licensing and the stock asset terms before publishing.
It depends on your plan and the asset source (premium libraries are typically tiered and capped). If you're publishing ads or client work, confirm the plan's commercial/resale coverage in the official terms/help docs.
You can't remove the watermark on the free plan—watermark removal is a paid feature. If you need publishable exports, you'll need a paid tier or a tool with a no-watermark free policy.
Chrome tends to be the safest choice for editing and exports. Some users report playback/export issues on Firefox, especially on longer projects.
This is commonly reported with longer timelines or heavy assets. Try exporting in Chrome, splitting long videos into shorter segments, and reducing effects/overlays before re-exporting.
Exported videos generally remain usable, but your editing access and monthly credits can change after cancellation. If you're mid-project, export final versions before your billing period ends.
Based on public docs + aggregated user feedback. Limits may vary by account.